The Times reported today that childminder Elizabeth D'Arcy took on so many toddlers that she did not remember their names and had to physical restrain them by strapping them into car seats.

I note that The Times sensible avoided using the word caring, presumably recognising that whatever Ms D'Arcy was doing, she was not caring for the children.

I find it amazing that she has apparently been "caring" for children for 13 years yet she had not had any unannounced visits by inspectors until a parent informed the authorities that she was suspicious about Ms D'Arcy as a result of being asked to wait outside the house when collecting her child.

Surely with routine inspections there should be scope for the inspectors to turn up unannounced to inspect the premises of a childminder and ensure that care is suitable and kind and that children are not having their human rights violated and are being treated with compassion?